<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cockroaches and Balloons:Weiningerian Reactions to a Distractionist</title>
	<link>http://phlogma.com/general/cockroaches-and-balloons-weiningerian-reactions-to-a-distractionist-20</link>
	<description>causing pain since 3000 BCE</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 13:26:44 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: iaia</title>
		<link>http://phlogma.com/general/cockroaches-and-balloons-weiningerian-reactions-to-a-distractionist-20#comment-66</link>
		<author>iaia</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Jan 2005 21:17:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://phlogma.com/general/cockroaches-and-balloons-weiningerian-reactions-to-a-distractionist-20#comment-66</guid>
		<description>The radiation resistance of cockroaches is somewhat overrated. See May Berenbaum's article, &lt;a href="http://www.entsoc.org/pubs/AE/AE-2001/fall/busswords.pdf"&gt;"Rad Roaches"&lt;/a&gt; in &lt;em&gt;American Entomologist&lt;/em&gt;, vol 47, no.3, 2001. Also, Hume was ok, but, as a woman, I would have found Kant more intriguing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The radiation resistance of cockroaches is somewhat overrated. See May Berenbaum&#8217;s article, <a href="http://www.entsoc.org/pubs/AE/AE-2001/fall/busswords.pdf">&#8220;Rad Roaches&#8221;</a> in <em>American Entomologist</em>, vol 47, no.3, 2001. Also, Hume was ok, but, as a woman, I would have found Kant more intriguing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

